It seems as if everyone you meet these days has a smartphone. Whether their preference is for a model manufactured by Apple or the increasingly popular Android based phones most consumers are taking full advantage of the cameras that are now standard with most models.
However, many of these consumers are also the proud owner of a compact digital camera, such as the Canon t3i. Should we surprised at this? After all, smartphones are being used to post pictures to the Internet, as well as populate the many social media sites like Instagram with what seem to be perfectly acceptable images.
The fact is, while smartphones have been a rapidly evolving technology and market, most people are still content with the quality of the well known digital camera. High quality smartphones are able to take good enough photos but there is almost no doubt that the direct and indirect cost of these smartphone will easily surpass that of digital cameras, taking into consideration other personal data that could be lost as well as the cost of mobile plans.
There is also a wide variety of differing digital cameras that were made for certain uses. A great example of this is cameras made for travelling, such as holidaying or camping.
If you would like to take photos while you are snorkelling, is it better to take photos using a smartphone or a waterproof digital camera. I hope the answer is quite obvious. The danger of losing smartphones entails a huge loss of data, including contact information, stored files etc. and this means that the cost of smartphones is actually much greater than that of digital cameras.
A very strong and sturdy digital camera should be able to be fairly shock and damage resistant and should be able to survive tourist trips, long travels and lots of sudden movement. Dropping a digital camera onto the ground might result in some marks and a few scratches but compare that to dropping a smartphone on the ground. A broken screen won't be the only thing you should be concerned about here.
There is also the simple matter of pixels. For those who really on crisp photography to make a living the cameras that are integrated into almost every smartphone are just not up to the job. Architects, surveyors and even realtors need the crispness that is supplied by those extra pixels in even value for money digital compact cameras.
In the end it comes down to personal choice. The fact of the matter is that although smartphones do have passable cameras the replacement cost is extremely high. A very capable digital camera can be purchased for an extremely reasonable outlay.
However, many of these consumers are also the proud owner of a compact digital camera, such as the Canon t3i. Should we surprised at this? After all, smartphones are being used to post pictures to the Internet, as well as populate the many social media sites like Instagram with what seem to be perfectly acceptable images.
The fact is, while smartphones have been a rapidly evolving technology and market, most people are still content with the quality of the well known digital camera. High quality smartphones are able to take good enough photos but there is almost no doubt that the direct and indirect cost of these smartphone will easily surpass that of digital cameras, taking into consideration other personal data that could be lost as well as the cost of mobile plans.
There is also a wide variety of differing digital cameras that were made for certain uses. A great example of this is cameras made for travelling, such as holidaying or camping.
If you would like to take photos while you are snorkelling, is it better to take photos using a smartphone or a waterproof digital camera. I hope the answer is quite obvious. The danger of losing smartphones entails a huge loss of data, including contact information, stored files etc. and this means that the cost of smartphones is actually much greater than that of digital cameras.
A very strong and sturdy digital camera should be able to be fairly shock and damage resistant and should be able to survive tourist trips, long travels and lots of sudden movement. Dropping a digital camera onto the ground might result in some marks and a few scratches but compare that to dropping a smartphone on the ground. A broken screen won't be the only thing you should be concerned about here.
There is also the simple matter of pixels. For those who really on crisp photography to make a living the cameras that are integrated into almost every smartphone are just not up to the job. Architects, surveyors and even realtors need the crispness that is supplied by those extra pixels in even value for money digital compact cameras.
In the end it comes down to personal choice. The fact of the matter is that although smartphones do have passable cameras the replacement cost is extremely high. A very capable digital camera can be purchased for an extremely reasonable outlay.
About the Author:
Want to find out more about the best digital cameras? Visit Mike Thompson's site on how to choose the best digital camera bundles at http://digitalcamerabundlereviews.com.
0 comments:
Post a Comment